CBaird's Action Research 5301
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Action Research Progress Report
My
action research plan is well under way.
I have analyzed and interpreted STAAR assessment data and I have
identified smart goals that will be targeted for small group instruction. Since I am the only 5th grade math
teacher on my campus I have been participating in vertical team planning to
develop small group activities for the targeted TEKS. I have also reached out to the grade level
science teacher as well as math teachers who teach other grade levels to see if they would be willing to integrate small
group math instruction. Initially, I had
anticipated that I would be working with a team of math teachers that would
assist in developing small group math instruction However; I am the only
teacher utilizing small group instruction. As I teach small group expectations to the
students I will then be able to identify any successes or problems with the
small group instruction. I have already
encountered a problem in keeping the students that I am not meeting with on
task. I have given my students their
first six weeks assessment and the data was not promising. I was able to identify some additional TEKS
that I can target in upcoming small group lessons. I believe that as the students become more
accustom to the routine then I will begin to see improvement in each of the students’
academic performance. Likewise, I plan
on interviewing students, parents and teachers to see how they perceive small
group instruction and if they feel it is making an impact on increasing student
academic performance.
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Week 5 Reflection
When I began this course, EDLD 5301 Action Research I was a bit intimidated. The title itself instilled negative connotations of reading literature reviews, and journals. However to my surprise I learned that Actions Research is completely the opposite to my previous understanding. Action Research is a professional development tool that allows educators to work collaboratively in attempting to problem solve. I also have a better understanding of the importance of reflection. Every effective administrator using reflection to identify if they are headed in the correct direction as well as to verify if previous actions were successful or unsuccessful. Overall, I enjoyed this class and look forward in applying what I learned in this upcoming school year.
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Action Research Plan (Revised) week 4
Action Planning Template
|
|||||
Goal: Determine
the effectiveness of small group math instruction and its impact on student
performance.
Objectives/Outcomes
of Research:
·
To improve student achievement and learning for
all students.
·
To improve scores of below grade level 5th
grade math students.
·
To improve collaborative and cooperation to
increase academic achievement.
·
To improve differentiation of instruction within
the classroom.
|
|||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
Review current
research on small group instruction focusing on math.
|
Carson Baird
|
August 2013-
September 2013
|
Literature
Reviews/Course Readings
Internet
|
Relevancy to topic and
action research plan.
|
|
Analyze interpret
STAAR assessment data to identify areas that will be targeted for small group
instruction.
(Quantitative Data)
|
Carson Baird
Grade-Level Department
|
End of August 2013-
Mid September-2014
|
2011 STAAR Scores
TEKS
Eduphoria
|
TEKS that students
missed 50% of will be identified.
|
|
Collaborated with
grade level teachers to develop small group activities for the targeted TEKS.
|
Carson Baird
Grade-Level Department
|
End of August 2013-
Mid September-2014
|
STAAR assessment data
TEKS
|
Meeting Minutes
Lesson Plans
|
|
Observe teachers in
the classroom to see if activities are implemented into small group
instruction.
|
Carson Baird
Grade-Level Department
|
End of August 2013-
Mid September 2013
|
Observations
Lesson Plans
Digital Cameras
|
Observation Summaries
Display pictures to
share with stakeholders to show collaborative learning through small group
instruction.
|
|
Create Interview
Questions to identify success or problems with implementing small group
instruction.
(Qualitative Data)
|
Carson Baird
|
October 2013-
May 2014
|
Interview Questions
|
Interview Question
Responses
|
|
Interview students,
parents of the students and teachers to see how they perceive if small group
math instruction is impacting academic achievement.
(Quantitative Data)
|
Carson Baird
Student Focus Groups
|
Middle of January
2014-
March 2014
|
Teacher
Parent
Student
Interview Questions
|
Interview Question
Responses
|
|
Teachers will actively
monitor assessments and daily work to gain insight as to what TEKS students
still need support or if they are improving.
(Quantitative Data)
|
Carson Baird
Grade Level Department
|
September 2013-
May 2014
|
Laptop
Eduphoria
Grade book
|
Data from assessments
and teachers grade books.
|
|
Math department will
implement review stations before Math STAAR testing.
|
Carson Baird
Grade Level Department
|
May 2014
|
Math Manipulative
Resources required for
each station.
|
Students will be
required to complete activities for each review station.
|
|
Analyze common
assessment and STAAR data and summary of teacher, parent, and student surveys.
|
Carson Baird
Grade Level Department
|
May 2014
|
Copies of 2011-2012
AEIS report; Preliminary STAAR Scores
Eduphoria
|
Comparison table to
assess areas of strengths and weakness in math.
|
|
Present Findings and
recommendations with key stakeholders.
|
Carson Baird
Grade Level Department
Administrative team
|
June 2014
|
Staff Meeting
Projector
Power Point
Presentation
|
Analyze the findings
and determine the effectiveness of small group instruction and its impact on
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Action Research Plan
Action Planning Template
|
||||
Goal: Determine
the effectiveness of small group math instruction and its impact on student
performance.
Objectives/Outcomes
of Research:
·
To improve student achievement and learning for
all students.
·
To improve scores of below grade level 5th
grade math students.
·
To improve collaborative and cooperation to
increase academic achievement.
·
To improve differentiation of instruction within
the classroom.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
Review current
research on small group instruction focusing on math.
|
Carson Baird
|
August 2013-
September 2013
|
Literature
Reviews/Course Readings
Internet
|
Relevancy to topic and
action research plan.
|
Analyze interpret
STAAR assessment data to identify areas that will be targeted for small group
instruction.
|
Carson Baird
Grade-Level Department
|
End of August 2013-
Mid September-2014
|
2011 STAAR Scores
TEKS
Eduphoria
|
TEKS that students
missed 50% of will be identified.
|
Collaborated with
grade level teachers to develop small group activities for the targeted TEKS.
|
Carson Baird
Grade-Level Department
|
End of August 2013-
Mid September-2014
|
STAAR assessment data
TEKS
|
Meeting Minutes
Lesson Plans
|
Observe teachers in
the classroom to see if activities are implemented into small group
instruction.
|
Carson Baird
Grade-Level Department
|
End of August 2013-
Mid September 2013
|
Observations
Lesson Plans
Digital Cameras
|
Observation Summaries
Display pictures to
share with stakeholders to show collaborative learning through small group
instruction.
|
Create Interview
Questions to identify success or problems with implementing small group
instruction.
|
Carson Baird
|
October 2013-
May 2014
|
Interview Questions
|
Interview Question
Responses
|
Interview students and
teachers to see how they perceive if small instruction is impacting academic
achievement.
|
Carson Baird
Student Focus Groups
|
Middle of January 2014-
March 2014
|
Teacher/Student
Interview Questions
|
Interview Question
Responses
|
Teachers will actively
monitor assessments and daily work to gain insight as to what TEKS students
still need support or if they are improving.
|
Carson Baird
Grade Level Department
|
September 2013-
May 2014
|
Laptop
Eduphoria
Grade book
|
Data from assessments
and teachers grade books.
|
Math department will
implement review stations before Math STAAR testing.
|
Carson Baird
Grade Level Department
|
May 2014
|
Math Manipulative
Resources required for
each station.
|
Students will be
required to complete activities for each review station.
|
Analyze common
assessment and STAAR data.
|
Carson Baird
Grade Level Department
|
May 2014
|
Copies of 2011-2012
AEIS report; Preliminary STAAR Scores
Eduphoria
|
Comparison table to
assess areas of strengths and weakness in math.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)